Financial Planning

Help! My growth assets aren’t assets anymore!

By Greg Bonner
Certified financial planner


Growth assets may be defined as assets which outperform inflation over the long term, such as shares and property. During the nineties in particular, they represented a portion of a balanced type portfolio that would create the growth required to allow the investor to achieve their personal financial goals. Growth assets were viewed as more tax efficient, inflation proof and offering superior rates of return over defensive assets such as fixed interest or cash.

The last couple of years have been particularly disastrous for unseasoned investors, and the more panicked of these have been desperate to dump their once loved growth assets both here and especially overseas. This has in turn created a self-fulfilling prophecy. As asset prices have diminished other investors have become unnerved, sold out and driven prices, and so performance, well below long term averages. This is illustrated by the representative index figures given in Table 1.

Table 1: One Year Returns versus Historical Returns from January 1920
Index Represents 1 Year Returns to 28th February, 2003 Historical Returns to December,2002
S&P/ASX 300 Aust. Equities - 14.7% 12.79%*




MSCI World Ex Aust (Aust. Dollars) International Equities - 23.3% 8.02%



This raises two questions:

Is it time to cut losses and sell out of growth assets altogether?


If I was an investor, more than ‘uncomfortable’ (losing
sleep) with the volatility associated with growth assets,
unhappy with lack of income from overseas equities and
thinking that ‘long term’ means next year, the answer
might be a resounding ’yes’. Alternatively, if I decided I
could cope with the vagaries of growth asset investing
and really could take a longer-term view (particularly with regard to the part of my portfolio that was exposed to growth assets), then maybe a smaller adjustment could be useful. For example, more exposure to listed property and less to international shares can ‘cool’ down a portfolio while providing sound income yields.

Why not pull out of equities till things settle, then buy back
in later when things improve?

This can be useful on a tax basis when matching gains and losses. Sometimes, with a little luck, this technique may work well, safeguarding the performance of a portfolio. Just as often, market timing can be disastrous. Since I have yet to meet the broker, analyst or other expert who can consistently sell out a portfolio of investments, wait a period of time, buy into a new portfolio and sell for profit, all at the right times, I’m loathe to assist anyone to attempt it. Moreover, market timing has the potential to produce significantly more nail biting stress than a ‘balanced’ investment approach ever could. For an investor unable to cope with current levels of discomfort, why raise the temperature further? The figures in Table 2 how sensitive the value of a portfolio of investments can be, relative to which days these were invested.

Table 2: Effect of being out of the US markets

Daily data between 30 June, 1989 – 21 July, 2002 Total return Difference vs. BMI US
BMI (Broad Market Index) United States 366.16%  
     
Excluding 10 best days 239.34% 126.82%
Excluding 10 worst days 606.01% 239.85%
Excluding both 10 best & worst days 396.11% 29.95%
Excluding 20 best days 223.15% 143.01%
Excluding 20 worst days 646.03% 279.87%
Excluding both 20 best & worst days 393.71% 27.55%
Excluding 30 best days 127.21% 238.95%
Excluding 30 worst days 1,115.42% 749.26%
Excluding both 30 best & worst days 387.52% 21.36%



For example, just by excluding the ten best days can result in a notional loss of return by -126 %. Excluding best and worst days can result in a positive effect 29.95%. Although this would not, I suspect, alleviate the pain of choosing when and how to perform the task.

There is of course a third option, using alternative type investments to raise the return potential of your portfolio whilst lowering the volatility/risk at the same time. In theory, direct derivative investments like warrants and options (imbedded with the right strategies), have the potential to lower portfolio risk, significantly so at times. This is due to the fact that their up-swings and downswings vary from those of traditional investments, thus producing a counterbalance which is more comfortable to the investor. The same effect is found with certain hedge or absolute return funds, subject to the specialist skills of the manager/s. However, before you think this is the panacea for all financial ills, a word of caution; in practice these are very complex instruments, which for different reasons may be quite unsuitable for you, and allocating too much to this area can be counterproductive in itself. Also, the independent, qualified advice required to assist you may be necessary but still not be sufficient in itself, largely owing to the huge number of uncertainties with investing. Ultimately, whether you choose to actively take control and seek professional advice or simply wait till the market drought is over, the past two years are part of the conundrum and nature of investing. Sometimes it’s healthier to have the grandchildren come and stay, contact friends you haven’t seen in a while or find that beach you always wanted to see on the other side of the country.

CONTACTS
Greg Bonner CFP, authorised representative

Logical Financial Management Australia Pty Ltd

Member Firm of Associated Planners Financial Services Ltd

Cherrybrook Office: 12 Milford Grove,
Cherrybrook NSW 2126

Phone: (02) 9899 4492 Email: logical@apfs.com.au

 

 

 
Peace of Mind: PO Box 1042, Chatswood NSW 2057 Australia
Tel + 61 2 9403 7774 Fax + 61 2 9403 7776   |    Email: info@forpeaceofmind.com.au


Please email the webmaster peaceofmind@it3.com.au if there are any improvements you would like to see in this web site

The contents of Peace of Mind which are covered by copyright may not be reproduced or copied without the written permission of the publisher. Opinions expressed in articles are those of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the publisher. All freelance contributions and correspondence must be accompanied by a self-addressed envelope stamped to the appropriate value (including registered or certified mail if required). Peace of Mind does not accept responsibility for damage to, or loss of, unsolicited material submitted for publication. The content and accuracy of advertisements accepted are the responsibility of the advertiser. All prices and conditions quoted in Peace of Mind are based on the latest information received. The publisher cannot be held responsible for any inconvenience or expense resulting from a subsequent alteration to price or conditions.